The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was originally approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in 2006, and was introduced to the public as a vaccine that could protect women against HPV 16 and HPV 18, the two strains of the HPV virus, believed to be responsible for 70% of all cases of cervical cancer. [1]
However, despite the fact that the World Health Organization (WHO) have continually portrayed the HPV vaccine as safe and effective, a large number of professionals from around the world, have been questioning the potential dangers of the vaccine, for many years.
One such professional, is Professor Christopher Exley. In a 2024, newsletter, [2], he wrote that:
“There is no ‘top trumps’ on the worst of vaccines that include an aluminium adjuvant. However, so-called vaccines against the human papilloma virus (HPV) must give most a run for their money. Herein I simply wish to direct you to critical comment and information on this subject. I hope that this will be sufficient to deter you from subjecting yourself or your child to this evil vaccine. I say vaccine and not vaccines because we were at least able to knock Glaxo Smith Klein’s Cervarix on the head. This leaves us with Merck’s Gardasil vaccines. No so-called vaccine, probably including covid products, has maimed and killed more adolescents over the past twenty years.”
According to Professor Exley, one of the main reasons that the HPV vaccine is so dangerous, is the fact that it contains more of the adjuvant, aluminium, than any other vaccine.
Professor Exley, has studied the subject of aluminium, for over 40 years and is widely regarded as the world’s leading expert on the subject.
In September, 2018, I interviewed Professor Exley, on the subject of aluminium, with researcher Amanda Dew, at Keele University.
During the hour long interview, Professor Exley explained to us, that not only has there have never been any safety trials on the use of aluminium in vaccines, but also that there has never been any regulation on the amount of aluminium, that a vaccine can contain.
In other words, the pharmaceutical industry, is free to add as much aluminium to a vaccine, as they want to.
Maybe this is the reason why, in 2014, the pharmaceutical company Merck, chose to more than double the amount of aluminium adjuvant in their Gardasil 9 vaccine.
Professor Exley, stated that, parents are not told the facts about the HPV vaccine, before their child is vaccinated.
He told us that, in his opinion, if parents were told that at least one in every fifty HPV vaccines administered, caused an adverse reaction, and that these adverse reactions, could be anything from a sore arm, through to death, then fewer parents would agree to have their child vaccinated. [3]
Sadly, our interview with Professor Exley, has since been banned on just about every possible film channel.
However, as you are probably aware, nothing ever truly disappears from the Internet and we still have a copy of our interview.
Every Year Concerns about the HPV Vaccine Increase
There have been concerns about the safety of the HPV vaccine, Gardasil and Gardasil 9 for many years.
In 2014, scientific researcher, Norma Erickson, published an extremely powerful press release, expressing her concerns about the HPV vaccination, on the SaneVax website. [4]
Although, this extremely powerful document remains on the SaneVax website, several copies of the document that had been forwarded to others, mysteriously disappeared from the Internet.
However, like our film, we also have a copy of her press release.
In her document, Erickson wrote the following paragraph:
“Malfeasance is when a public official violates the public trust by performing an act that is wrongful, legally unjustified or contrary to law. Nonfeasance is the failure to act where there is a duty to act. Misfeasance is conduct that is lawful but inappropriate. Perhaps when it comes to the recent approval of Gardasil 9 all of these apply.”
She continued that:
10 December 2014: The FDA approved a reportedly ‘new and improved’ Gardasil which will be marketed as Gardasil 9. According to the FDA approval letter, this action was taken without consultation with VRBPAC (the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.) which is responsible for reviewing and evaluating data concerning, the safety, effectiveness and appropriate use of vaccines and related biological products.”
If the FDA had nothing to hide, then why didn’t they use the appropriate agencies, to make sure that this new and improved vaccination, was fit for purpose?
After all, isn’t the health and safety of the public, the FDA’s number one priority?
According to the evidence, used by Ms Erickson to back up her claims, it was the CBER (Centre for Biological Evaluation and Research) that decided that there was no need for the VRBPAC to review or evaluate any data concerning the safety, effectiveness and appropriate use of Merck’s proposed Gardasil 9 vaccine, before making a decision to approve the nine-valent HPV vaccine.
Erickson stated that, by increasing the aluminium adjuvant from 225 mcg to a massive 500 mcg per vaccine, children as young as twelve, could be vaccinated with 1500 mcg of aluminium over the course of a year, if they received the recommended three doses.
That amount of aluminium does not include the aluminium contained in any other vaccination that they may have also been vaccinated with.
Norma Erickson published her press release in 2014, and my interview with Professor Christopher Exley, was published in 2018.
At the time, we both expressed our concerns about using aluminium adjuvants in vaccination. We all exposed factual evidence to back up our claims.
We would like to know the reason why, our evidence was not only completely dismissed, but also why our filmed interview in particular, was removed from the Internet.
Especially as according to our research, the HPV vaccination has injured more children and young adults, than any other vaccination in history.
References
By: Christina England
Books.
Bio
Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children’s library, specializing in storytelling and book buying. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980.
After taking an A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Support, Ms. England spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She gained a Higher National Diploma in Journalism and Media Studies in 2010 and in 2016 she gained a BA Hons degree in Literature and Humanities.
Leave a Reply